Many people who call themselves Christians espouse democracy and advocate spreading democracy across the globe. But when one analyzes the system and the workings of a democracy, it is clear that democracy truly isn’t the panacea to world political problems.
Democracy means “people rule”. This is already a prologue to a plethora of problems and is directly contrary to what Christianity is all about. If you are a Christian, you should realize that Christ is the Ruler, and not proven depraved man. Many so-called Christians then say, “Yeah a democracy is wrong, but I believe in a republic.” The workings of a democracy and the workings of a republic are subtly different but the outcome of the two can rarely be differentiated. In a democracy, the general public elects representatives who will enforce the public’s opinion and views and supposedly enforces these beliefs regardless of the representatives’ personal beliefs. So in other words, in a democracy, a dummy is elected who carries out the will of his or her constituents often suspending his or her own judgment in order to maintain the position. In a republic, the general public elects representatives, and then relies on these representatives’ own judgment as the rule of the land. Many false Christian then say that America was originally founded as a republic and has digressed to a democracy in its perversion.
The truth is, neither system is right in the sight of God. In both systems, the majority or the most powerful becomes the governing force, NOT morality and righteousness. In a democracy, if the majority favors a particular evil, the dummies in position implement the evil in order to maintain politically correct and true to their constituents. In a republic, if the majority favors a particular idiot or godless representative, that representative is placed in position to institute his or her nonsense. Neither system upholds the truths of God nor does either system ensure that the laws of God underlie the final outcome.
The proper form of government would be a system that bars criminals as defined by God from governing positions. It would have inscribed into permanent law that only “men who fear God and hate dishonest gain” could be considered for governing positions. It would select righteousness, wisdom, faith to God, and justice to be prime criterion by which those placed in position would be qualified. Majority, money, status, ethnicity, diversity, and worldly education would not even be considered as any worthy factor in ascertaining who is fit or not fit for administering God’s laws in the proper form of government.
So the proper form of government is really an easy one to understand. It would be a government that looked to God for all answers, one that used God’s Law as the underlying foundation and one that used men who feared God and impartially administered God’s Law upon society. This should be an easy lesson for those who call themselves Christians, since they claim to live by the rule of God.
In a democracy, those in the majority or those who have the most power establish their agenda and force it onto everyone else. However, majority and power have never been holy and just factors by which to govern society. In fact we read in Matthew 7:13-14, “ Enter ye in at the strait (narrow) gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life and few there be that find it.” In Exodus 23:2 we read also, “Thou shalt not follow a multitude to do evil.” In a democracy, that is exactly what happens and is exactly why America is so degenerate today. The majority of Americans that play a role in government are evil, and have evil desires against God and thus they enact these desires into law. Americans think broad in sin, and think very diverse in evil, and such broadness is the avenue to destruction. The truths of God are singular and are therefore narrow but right. Error is plural and can be as broad as the exclusion of truth. Majority rule then establishes the manifold ways of error and overruns the singularity of the truth.
In a republic, the same problem exists. The laws and truths of God are not used to ascertain who qualifies as a representative. Instead, whichever representative receives the majority vote wins the position. This turns the political system into a type of game and mocks the seriousness a true government should have. The representative then can implement whatever evil agenda he or she has on mind, because there is no safeguard inscribed into law that prohibits the transgression of God’s Law.
Humans prove diurnally and hourly that they are depraved and ignorant. It would be a brazen defiance of this truth to lend humans the authority to therefore make their own laws and govern themselves by these laws. Humans should always look to their Creator, and yield themselves to His governmental authority by enacting His Laws and enforcing His judgments.
Different democracies have varying constitutions, but the constitution of America says in the first amendment that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” God’s Law is not religion, but since it is called religion, this amendment says that Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of God’s Law. This is the very source of all the problems that have ever existed in the world. World problems have invariably been bred because someone had no respect for establishing or obeying the irenic laws of God. Furthermore, the constitution says, it cannot prohibit the free exercise of any religion. Again, this is another source of world problems. Hundreds of religions have existed so that when followers exercised their religion innocent people were killed, superstition was bred, true knowledge was suppressed, God was rejected, and wars and clashes ensued. Surely, prohibiting the exercise of such religions would have been the first step toward curbing many historical world problems. Furthermore, the constitution says that government should not “abridge the freedom of speech”. Time would fail me if I reiterate abusive speech after abusive speech throughout the world, and in America that has bred problem after problem after problem. Racist slurs, lies, cursing, slander, and all types of other harmful speech have shown that a restriction of speech to only that which is good, right and appropriate in the sight of God is the only type of speech that shouldn’t be prohibited. Tons and tons of examples exist illustrating that evil speech and lies have only bred problems for everybody and thus should be prohibited. Furthermore the constitution says that it cannot abridge the freedom of the press. How many times can we cite in history wherein book after book was published by various cults, atheists, philosophers, false teachers, dictators, or various other figures that expelled lie after lie, and diverted from the truths of God? Today, all kinds of evil books that poison the mind exist creating numerous problems in people’s lives. With all this in view, there is absolutely no way any sane person can espouse the American constitution. It precisely says that government cannot enact God’s Law which has proven to be the solution to world problems, and says that government cannot silence all the other religions, lies and other quack that has proven to be the very source of all the world’s problems.
God says that righteousness and morality should be the rule. In Psalms 45:6-7, we read, “Thy throne, O God is forever and ever: the scepter of thy kingdom is a right scepter. Thou lovest righteousness and hatest wickedness….” In Hebrews 1:8-9 we read the same things, “But unto the Son He saith, Thy throne, O God is forever and ever: a scepter of righteousness is the scepter of thy kingdom. Thou hast loved righteousness and hated iniquity; therefore God even thy God hath anointed thee with the oils of gladness above thy fellows. God says that evil, sin and wickedness should be totally destroyed regardless of its source. Democracy through America’s constitution says that God’s righteousness cannot be respected so as to be officially established, and that all other forms of beliefs, opinions, lies and cults cannot be suppressed or outlawed regardless of the problems they breed. A false American Christian can often be distinguished because they often side with the constitution against the command of God.
I said earlier that in a democracy a representative may enforce his or her constituents’ views while subordinating his or her own personal views. Many people cite this as being the beauty of a democracy. Think about this though. If the representative’s views are right and good, why suspend these good and moral views for the sake of the evil constituents’ views? Any representative that does this shows that what is morally right and good is not prime business in his or her mind, but instead, the vanity of pleasing depraved people is his or her lifeblood. If the representative’s views are evil and wrong and inappropriate, so that he or she enforces the constituents’ views instead, such a time would be perfect for he or she to immediately scrap his or her erroneous and wicked beliefs and embrace the truth. No matter how you look at it, a representative that blindly enforces the agenda of those who put him or her in office is a seriously dangerous dummy unfit for any good and morally responsible work in the sight of God.
In a republic, any group of people are gravely mistaken to assume that elected representatives will provide the closest uniformity to the laws of God, especially without a moral test that excludes immoral wrecks from being a representative. The election process is based on numbers or quantity, rather than on the immutable truths of God. This consequently causes the election process to blindly select degenerate representatives who may have looked good in the poles, but held a depraved agenda that appealed to the masses. Furthermore a republic doesn’t have God’s Laws as the underlying supreme law of the land to ensure that any decision a representative makes concurs with the judgments of God.
The perils of a republic/ democracy are witnessed daily by us all in America. Deep-seated special interest groups selfishly and immorally promulgate a sundry of ideas that ferociously destroy God’s righteousness and supplant it with ideas that benefit their evil businesses, interests or status. Perhaps the most notorious is the American Civil Liberties Union which is run by the devil and sues anyone or any organization that even appears to tend in the direction of God’s Laws. What makes the democracy of America so pathetic however is not that the Civil Liberty Union exists, because abominable organizations have always existed in all societies, but that the America Civil Liberties Union is a legal cause and is valid according to American democracy. There is nothing illegal nor unconstitutional about the American Civil Liberties Union even though all the members thereof are death worthy criminals, and are causing murder for many of the citizens such as through their agenda sponsoring abortion, euthanasia, violence in the media, and etc. The first amendment to America’s constitution bars the government from pursuing relentlessly after the virulence of the American Civil Liberties Union even though murder, lies, God-hate mongering, atheism, and ignorance is the essence of its existence. The American Civil Liberties Union is not the only one either, but many homosexual special interest groups exist, and abortion special interest groups exist, among others, which have no right from God to exist.
Democracy can be fundamentally proven erroneous as well. People need corporal government because they have to be corporally governed. They need to be corporally governed, primarily because they have proven to be evil, wrong, ignorant, selfish, and without proper care for others. Without corporal government, people would nearly self-destruct or disintegrate because they would run over the rights of each other for their own benefit. Since people are like this, it would be foolish to expect them to make their own proper laws, because the laws would likewise reflect their selfishness and ignorance. Therefore in order for a government to be properly established, people have to look outside themselves, toward the perfect Creator, and enact His Laws and live by His inerrant rules. People ruling themselves via their own laws is a blatant defiance of why people need government in the first place.
Many false Christians say that the founding fathers established freedom of religion in view of the suppression of worshipping God prevalent in Europe. They say that the founding fathers came to America seeking freedom to worship God, and engraved into law this freedom. While some minority groups may have left Europe in order to worship God without persecution, the founding fathers were never part of such groups, and they concocted a constitution that clearly harbors protection for any imaginable abomination even blasphemy against God. If they truly thought that worship of God should be protected, they should have wrote in the constitution that government should establish worship of God as rule of Law and instead of them making their own laws they would have simply used the Laws of God, since only via such Laws can reverence to God be corporally enforced. The fact that the founding fathers didn’t establish God’s Laws as the supreme law of the Land proves that they didn’t think God’s Laws were right for that matter. The fact that they said in the first amendment that Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, while counting God’s Laws and judgments as religion, shows that they clearly didn’t value and respect God’s judgments. The fact that the founding fathers barred government from curtailing all the various forms of religion shows that the founding fathers didn’t have any interest in curtailing all the problems, superstition, quack, and even violence that many religions have proven to instigate.
False Christians often say that the constitution’s meaning has been stretched and misconstrued by liberals. They say that there is no way that the founding fathers could have imagined all the various forms of evil that exist today that liberals give constitutional protection to. If this is true, this is indeed one significant reason why God’s Law should be enacted rather than man’s law, because man is short-sighted, doesn't fully understand the ramifications of digressing from God, and doesn’t know what future events may bring about. But arguably, the language to the first amendment clearly says that Congress shall make no law restricting free speech, press and religion and the founding fathers were very aware that many forms of abusive and evil speech and literature existed, even in that day and time, and that many forms of religion had caused immense problems in the past. Since they knew this, it is evident that they didn’t have a clear agenda against all forms of evil, and today, the fruit of this tolerance for evil is apparent. Liberals are not stretching nor misconstruing the constitution. The constitution was inspired by the devil through an epileptic James Madison, and the constitution subtly protects all forms of evil freedom and expression.
People claim that democracy is good because it gives all religions a fair chance and allows people to speak their mind. People who make such an assertion miserably fail to see that it is exactly what is in many people’s mind that has given rise to countless historic problems. Furthermore there is a toggle in life between good and evil. You cannot allow good and evil at the same time. You cannot allow a false religion alongside morality. You cannot allow the truth and a lie. You must either allow good and stamp out evil, or allow evil and suppress good. You must either allow only false religions and fight against morality, or enact morality and outlaw all false religions since they are contrary to morality. You must embrace the truth and dispel lies, or you must embrace lies and annihilate the truth. This is the “either / or” principle and it is absolute and can never be suspended. Christ said in Matthew 6:24, “No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one and love the other or else he will hold to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon.” Therefore America’s constitution cannot allow wicked organizations to express their ideas while simultaneously allowing righteous organizations to speak and practice the truths of God. By the constitution allowing the wicked organizations, it directly goes against the righteousness of organizations that declare that wicked organizations should be destroyed. By the constitution tolerating and protecting abusive and evil speech and lies, it goes directly against righteous speech which clearly says the evil speech and lies should be abolished. By the constitution protecting evil religions and beliefs, it goes directly against righteousness that commands that such religions and beliefs be annihilated.
Truth is always against all lies. Righteousness is always against all evil. God is always against satan. Good, sound and moral speech is always against evil, abusive and false speech. Righteous, irenic, sound and moral literature is always against violent, murderous, and evil literature. God’s Law is always against false religions which glorify man and propel people away from the true God unto lies and deception. Therefore, the constitution cannot allow both of these at the same time. But since the constitution claims to do this, we know that the constitution is evil because evil is always deceptive, and evil is the only thing that will give other evils the right to exist. This shows that democracy cannot accomplish the righteousness of God, because by democracy allowing evil, it allows this evil so as to destroy the righteousness of God.
People say then to me, “How do you know what is right?” or “Why do you think you are the only one right?” They then say that the constitution allows everyone to speak their minds because different people have different ideas about what is right and we have to tolerate each other’s varying viewpoints. This is absurd and ridiculous reasoning. If you are wrong, you might as well tolerate others who are wrong because there is hardly any tangible difference. This illustrates the predominant scene in America. Nearly everybody is wrong. The Republicans are wrong, as well as the democrats. The independents are wrong, as well as the moderates.But when you have the truth, you should NOT tolerate anything that is contrary to truth because this results in more error. Only those in the truth know that they are in the truth. Therefore when you hear people saying, “How do you know what is right?” you clearly know that they definitely don’t have the truth themselves. Truth illuminates and cast light so that all falsehood is revealed. Falsehood casts a shadow and blinds one so that one cannot be sure what is right or wrong. Since the majority of Americans embrace falsehood, they hardly know what is right or what is wrong. Their inability to know what is right and wrong doesn’t impede anybody with the truth however from seeing what is truly right and what is truly wrong.
Democracy in America has proven that it cannot accomplish the righteousness of God nor protect the innocent among humans. It also proves that in a democracy, evil will always eventually gain acceptance and good will be abolished, thus reiterating the same kinds of problems that have perpetually plagued manmade laws. Here are some examples. American democracy has allowed innocent humans still in their mother’s womb to be murdered. Babies in their mother’s womb are not being murdered against the rules of democracy but in compliance to the rules of a democracy. This shows that nearly the worse form of atrocity on earth is easily allowed in a democracy. God’s Laws and God’s righteousness however would never allow murder. American democracy has allowed homosexuals to exist and function in society to the extent that homosexuals are now trying to construct society in congruence to their abomination and are trying to destroy people who maintain the proper roles and functions of the genders. God’s Laws and God’s righteousness have already decried this heinous practice and instrumentally destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah for their tolerance of this and other destructive practices. American democracy has allowed violent games, movies and books to be printed which have instrumentally led unstable minds into horrendous acts against other people. God’s Laws and God’s righteousness have already outlawed such violence. American democracy has abolished the death penalty for death-worthy criminals such as murderers, kidnappers, and various other criminals in certain states only to feed them in prison by stealing from the society they harmed unreasonable amounts of money daily. Again I should say, no one has broken the democratic rules in this injustice. God’s Laws and God’s righteousness say that death worthy criminals should swiftly receive the death penalty, thus procuring justice, and avoiding stealing from victims and tax-payers to keep the criminals alive. American democracy has outlawed the Bible in public schools, thus keeping American children in ignorance of the truths of God. American democracy has distorted justice and has rendered lengthier prison sentences to some people for abusing animals than for people who have murdered people. God’s Law and God’s righteousness have always had a consistent and harmonious application of justice and have never given animals more “rights” than people. American democracy has led the nation into various wars such as the Vietnam War and the war in Iraq unjustly, only to cause mass murder in the occupying countries, unnecessary American casualties, and citizens robbed of their much needed money to support the unjust, abusive and murderous war efforts. God’s Law and righteousness has only declared war on sin and wickedness and thus people who have died perpetuating God’s righteousness died for very worthy causes and will be rewarded by God in the end. People who have died perpetuating the heathen founding father’s ideology and American democracy suffered the due consequences such man-made laws have always caused. There is never a reward from God to anybody who died protecting laws other than His own. American democracy according to its rules, has allowed adultery which has destroyed the proper family structure, causing a multitude of domestic altercations, fights, arguing, envy, jealousies, and restraining orders. Adultery has also been at the root of many murder-suicide episodes. God’s Law and righteousness strongly opposes adultery, thereby increasing family order and proper structure. American democracy has sought to equalize the roles of the genders causing women to seek occupations suited for men alone, and men to seek occupations suited for women alone. American democracy has also exalted feminism, which has led to an attrition of care and supervision for children who need it so much, thus opening the door for children to fall into trouble with the law, join gangs, and stray into drugs and other problems that proper and moral parental involvement and supervision could have prevented. Alas, American democracy has failed to even teach parents what morals are, and fails to accentuate the importance of administering righteousness. This explains why so many parents are so incompetent to even properly teach their children, and why parental involvement and supervision is quickly loosing any real moral significance. God’s Law and righteousness always equip everyone with a good sense of morality and strongly emphasizing parental duties and gives children their mothers and fathers back as their supervisors, with the mother and father properly fulfilling their respective, yet different duties.
I have named some of the most important themes in a society that democracy fails miserably at. What good is democracy since it allows the same types of heinous atrocities that have historically caused problems such as murder, theft, greed, and the destruction of the family, and that to a large degree? Surely, we who believe in God see that the panacea to the world problems is far from democracy, but is in God’s Laws and God righteousness and God’s government. Christ said in Matthew 15:7-9, “Ye hypocrites, well did Isaiah prophesy of you, saying, ‘This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth and honoureth me with their lips, but their heart is far from me. But in vain do they worship me, teaching as doctrine the commandments of men.” This is exactly what false Christians are doing by espousing democracy. They claim to believe and worship God, but they believe the laws of the founding fathers should be used in government and in society. They claim that they believe in God's Law and the Ten Commandments, but they believe in separation of church and state, and they want man's law to be the law of the land, while subordinating God's Ten Commandments to a unbinding historic monument in a courthouse, without any legal significance.They claim God is Lord, but their heart is far from God because they believe in democracy which doesn’t exist in heaven. Again, I say, democracy is nonexistent in heaven.
Many people say that democracy has its own special problems but it is the best we have. Such people evidently are assuming that democracy is better than the Laws and righteousness of God, or are totally not considering God’s Law and God’s government. Besides, what criterion do they judge societies to determine that democracy is indeed the best even among other man-made systems? I have heard many cite that democracy is the best because in Iran and other non-democracies, the Bible is banned and expression of Christianity may result in beheading. This is indeed terrible and voids such societies the right to existence. But American democracy is beheading millions of innocent babies in their mother’s womb before they can even express Christianity. Homosexuals are trying to pass legislation that will criminalize speech against homosexuals. This also forfeits American democracy a right to existence. Therefore the only proper gauge one can use to analyze what society is best is which society transgresses the Laws of God the least and adheres to morality the most. This is definitely not the gauge even many evangelicals use to when they say that America is the best society. Often they say America is the best based on how much money the general public has, how well educated the citizens are, how many people attend college, how well the road system is, how sophisticated the military is, how trained the medical doctors are, how good the health care system is, among other corporal factors that exclude how well trained and morally responsible the citizens are. The crime rate in America is definitely among the highest in the world, and thus shows that America is in the top in terms of depravity.
Democracy is the most efficient form of government for backwards, foolish, sinful, evil and immoral citizens to express their exceedingly diverse and erroneous views. Lies can always exist in a multitude because a lie is everything except the truth. Truth is always singular. The fact that 6-2 = 4 is a single answer. But a lie can be anything except the answer 4 for 6-2.. Although lies differ one from another, they always share at least two things in common. First, they are all lies, and second they are all contrary to the truth. Truth shares nothing in common with lies. Manmade dictatorships and authoritarian forms of government allow some forms of lies, but they stamp out lies that may be different from their own. A democracy allows all lies. Therefore to yield the maximum amount of error and lies, democracy is the best choice because it accomodates all lies and forms of error. Democracy cannot allow truth because its mere stance for allowing lies is a suppression of the truth. One may wish to contend that a democracy does indeed allow truth. But truth never even pretends to allow lies like democracy allows. Lies do however pretend to allow truth, because of course, they are lies. So democracy cannot allow truth and lies at the same time. Therefore to yield the most vibrant and diverse forms of lies and evil, a democracy is necessary to yield credence to it all, as opposed to a dictatorship or kingship which may allow only certain forms of lies and evils. Welcome to the modern democratic world of maximum error.
Democracy also ensures that societal atrocities hardly cease. If a dictator instigates evil policies that harm innocent people, his evil policies may cease when he exists office or when he dies. A dictator can also make sweeping changes to various procedures and may be able to quell certain problems fairly quickly. But in a democracy, when problems creep in they can hardly be changed because intricate voting procedures and majority rule procedures have to be followed making it a tedious and lengthy chore. In contrast to a dictator who can be personally blamed or even overthrown because of evil policies, a democracy’s problems are pervaded throughout the participating citizenry. No single person can ever be entirely blamed in a democracy. A sweeping change of mind and attitude throughout the entire society is the only way a democracy can change. For this reason, we hear of Conservatives blaming Liberals, Liberals blaming Conservatives, democrats blaming republicans, republicans blaming democrats, independents blaming moderates, but the real problem is ALL of them participating in a morally slumping democracy. Therefore virtually no significant problems are ever solved, and the society suffers for the worse as the problems inevitably yield ever-increasing fruit. This causes the society to get worse, with no single person to blame, and with no single person to overthrow or depose from office to immediately hault the problems. Additionally, in American democracy with a constitution that guarantees evil freedom, destruction of evil policies and beliefs so as to enact morality is unconstitutional, thereby providing a bulwark around all immoral problems and abolishing any hope that a cure can ever be constitutionally or legally had.
You may hear people saying, “If you don’t vote then don’t complain.” I am complaining about the voting process in and of itself, because voting should never be the way that moral and important decisions should be made. Can I vote to abolish voting? I don’t think so. Furthermore, even if we did vote, again, a democracy only allows evil and lies, and there are only idiotic political dummies waiting in line as candidates. One political dummy steers society away from a cliff and leads society into the furnace. Another leads society away from the furnace, but into a lion’s den. Regardless of the candidates in America, truth and morality are out of sight, and a choice between the least perceived virulent lie is the best voters get. Voters please complain about voting itself because voting falls short of curing the ills of society. In fact, all of what is deserves a complaint in America was established by voting either by the public or among the representatives in power.
Some people say that in a democracy people are expected to practice their beliefs responsibly and peacefully. No where does the constitution say this though. This means, to say the least, the constitution is miserably short-sighted and irrelevant in today’s diverse and ambiguous world. Also, if people are expected to practice their beliefs responsibly, then according to whose definition of “responsible” do such people use? Nowhere in the constitution is a definition to “responsible” given. Besides, any belief that doesn’t recognize total responsibility to God is innately irresponsible. And peacefully? If the belief is worth lending the right to existence, it should already be intrinsically peaceful. So this argument about responsibility and peacefulness is nonsense.
Thank God that heaven is not a democracy. Heaven is heaven because democracy DOES NOT exist there.